A dialogue with the issues of today.
A journey into the disorder.
A quest for contradictions.
An exploration of the ambiguity.
The openness of some works centers the viewer in the focus. He is the one that makes the work of art not only full of meaning, but actually helps it get into existence. Only his presence provides the interaction otherwise the art fact, like life, is just an empty dark canvas or a dead mirror of nonexistence.
The experience is created and recreated by interactions between a man and a machine.
This raises the questions of how we will get together in the very near future. Would artificial intelligence shift the balance towards a post-human kind of communication. Aren’t we actually living at the threshold of the post-human era?
Some works are a spontanenous reflection on the concept of motion. A motion in space and in time. The state of ongoing information flow makes it difficult to define a centre of our existence.
If we live only once, do we actually need to label and put tags? Where and when is the end of our journey? Is there an end or a beginning? Don’t we actually circle around? Are all these concepts just a question of a view point? Don’t you have the feeling that we all are experiencing the Schrödinger's cat experiment?
As we seek to rediscover our freedom of decoding, #untaggable should be the new ‘normal’.
Svetlin Stoev
